Back to job ads the right person never opens, interviews you wing, and a coin-flip on every hire.
An afternoon to write. A year to get wrong.
Most hiring processes produce one document and hope it does three jobs.
The internal JD — the brief that aligns your team on what the role actually is. The external ad — the version a passive candidate’s friend forwards over coffee. The interview plan — the design that covers every competency worth proving and gives every stage a reason to exist. These are different documents for different readers — and the studio produces all three.
The best person you could hire isn’t reading your job description. They’re being shown it by a friend over coffee. Write for the friend.
Paste a job-ad URL, the text, or a few keywords — yours, a competitor’s, the role that’s been open three months. The panel reads it line by line and leaves a note wherever it would push back.
A sample roast — paste your own ad above. It scrolls on its own — hover to pause, then scroll back over anything you missed.
The first one is free. So is the second.
So most hiring still comes down to a hunch and a good first impression. When your description is done, the same six reconvene and build the interview from it — the stages, what each one proves, and a scorecard precise enough that two interviewers grade the same answer the same way.
| Competency | Tested at |
|---|---|
| Owns a revenue funnel end-to-end | Work sample |
| Prioritises under real ambiguity | Case + panel |
| Moves people without authority | Backchannel |
| Writes the thinking down | Take-home memo |
Live work-sample on a real checkout-conversion problem from our own data. Knockout stage — a strong no here ends the loop.
Scorecard, 1–4: a 4 names the metric they’d move first and the experiment they’d run to move it; a 2 just lists features with no thesis.
Three partners they’d have no authority over. We watch whether the room leans in or politely waits for them to finish.
Scorecard, 1–4: a 4 changes a panellist’s mind on a real trade-off; a 2 wins the argument and loses the room.
This is what your Monday morning looks like.
Six of the most quoted voices in hiring, strategy and persuasion — one sharp, specific call each, to take or wave off.
Each note is inferred from the advisor’s public work — their books, talks and interviews. How the panel works →
A wrong hire you spend a year unwinding. The great candidate who read your first line and never opened the email. The Monday you spend rewriting last quarter’s description because no one remembered what the role was actually for. That’s the bill. It’s already running.
You pay the model directly. Your data, your bill, your kill switch. We don’t get between you and Anthropic.